In my personal opinion, I think art is mostly dependent on the involvement of another person. It may not necessarily be restricted to the artist's intention, because an emotional response can be found in pieces that were not intended to be art to begin with. I am tempted to say that art is only art when some being has a response to the piece and/or is interacting with it (kind of like, when a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?). However, this may be too narrow a view, since a painting is still art even after a museum has been closed for the night. It's another difficult question in the study of aesthetics.
No comments:
Post a Comment